Britt v. State
Britt v. State, 167 S.E. 203 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
MacIntyre, J.
Under the conflicting evidence in this case, the trial judge did not err in revoking the defendant’s parole and ordering that he serve the remainder of his sentence for a violation of the prohibition law.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, O. J., and Hooper, J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.