TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Smith Motor Car Co. v. Universal Credit Co.

Smith Motor Car Co. v. Universal Credit Co., 168 S.E. 19 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 1, 1933
Docket
No. 21476
Judges
Jenkins
Citations
168 S.E. 1946 Ga. App. 5221933 Ga. App. LEXIS 130

Opinion of the Court — Jenkins

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Jenkins, P. J.

Under the answer returned by the Supreme Court to the question certified to it in this case ( 176 Ga. 565 , 168 S. E. 18 ), the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, and the judge erred in directing a verdict in its favor.

Judgment reversed.

Stephens <md Sutton, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Smith Motor Car Co. v. Universal Credit Co., 168 S.E. 18 (Ga. 1933) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list