Dean v. State
Dean v. State, 172 S.E. 89 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Guerry, J.
The evidence of the possession of whisky was entirely circumstantial, and was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused. The court erred in overruling the motion for new trial.
Judgment reversed.
MacIntyre, J., concurs. Broyles, G. J., dissents.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.