TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Salter v. Nugent

Salter v. Nugent, 177 S.E. 513 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 24, 1934
Docket
No. 24157
Judges
Broyles
Citations
177 S.E. 51350 Ga. App. 1871934 Ga. App. LEXIS 687

Opinion of the Court — Broyles

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Broyles, C. J.

1. “Except in case of railroad companies, the master is not liable to one servant for injuries arising from the negligence or misconduct of other servants about the same business.” Civil Code (1910), § 3129; Brush Electric Co. v. Wells, 110 Ga. 192 ( 35 S. E. 365 ), and cases cited.

*188 Decided November 24, 1934. TJlmer & Dowell, for plaintiff. Adams, Adams & Douglas, for defendants.

2. There must be enough in a petition to amend by; and where it sets forth no cause of action, it can not be amended. A new and different ease from that made in the original petition can not be added by amendment. Jones v. Robinson, 172 Ga. 746 (3) ( 158 S. E. 752 ) ; Davis v. Muscogee Mfg. Co., 106 Ga. 126, 129 ( 32 S. E. 30 ); Kennemer v. W. & A. Railroad, 42 Ga. App. 266 (3) ( 155 S. E. 771 ).

3. The original petition in the instant case, properly construed (most strongly against the plaintiff), shows that the personal injuries sued for resulted from the negligence of a fellow servant of the plaintiff. While the petition contains some language tending to show otherwise, such language is clearly a conclusion of the pleader which is not supported by the facts set forth. The original petition set forth no cause of action whatever, and could not “by amendment be converted into a cause of action.” Davis v. Muscogee Mfg. Co., supra.

4. Under the foregoing rulings, the court did not err in disallowing the amendment to the original petition, or in dismissing the case on general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1938: 11940: 11942: 11945: 119382026peak 1938 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Morrison v. Lewis199 S.E. 782 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938)
  2. Strickland v. Foughner12 S.E.2d 371 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940)
  3. Blanchard v. Gallahar33 S.E.2d 379 (Ga. Ct. App. 1945)
  4. Hulsey v. Southeastern Greyhound Lines Inc.20 S.E.2d 449 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942)

Most recent

  1. Blanchard v. Gallahar33 S.E.2d 379 (Ga. Ct. App. 1945)
  2. Hulsey v. Southeastern Greyhound Lines Inc.20 S.E.2d 449 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942)
  3. Strickland v. Foughner12 S.E.2d 371 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940)
  4. Morrison v. Lewis199 S.E. 782 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Jones v. Robinson, 158 S.E. 752 (Ga. 1931) 35
Davis v. Muscogee Mfg. Co., 32 S.E. 30 (Ga. 1898) 28
Brush Elec. Light & Power Co. v. Wells, 35 S.E. 365 (Ga. 1900) 19
Kennemer v. Western & Atl. R.R., 155 S.E. 771 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list