Phillips v. State
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Broyles, C. J.
The defendant was convicted of a misdemeanor (possessing whisky), and the jury were authorized to find from the conflicting evidence that at the time charged in the accusation he was near the scene of the offense and actively aiding and abetting another in the commission of the crime charged. It follows that his conviction was supported by the evidence. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial, complaining of alleged errors of commission and omission in the charge of the court, show no cause for a reversal of the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., conew.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.