Harden v. State
Harden v. State, 183 S.E. 115 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Broyles, C. J.
Under the facts as disclosed by the record, the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion for a continuance, based on the absence of a material witness who had been subpoenaed for the defense; and that error rendered further proceedings nugatory.
Judgment reversed.
MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.