Foster v. Burnley
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Broyles, C. J.
1. Several excerpts from tlie charge of the court are complained of in the motion for new trial. While some of these detached fragments of the charge, if treated alone, are subject to slight criticism, when considered in the light of the charge as a whole, and the facts of the case, none of them discloses reversible error.
2. The verdict in favor of tlie defendant was amply authorized by the evidence. All of the special assignments of error are based on certain excerpts from the charge of the court, and are without substantial merit. The refusal to grant a new trial was not error for any reason assigned. Judgment affirmed.
MacIntyre mid Guerry, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.