Jewel Tea Co. v. Rowling
Jewel Tea Company v. Rowling
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Stephens, P. J.
This case, which is a suit by a wife for personal injuries alleged to have been received by the negligence of the defendant arising from the same transaction on which is based her husband’s suit to recover of the same defendant for loss of the wife’s services, is controlled by the decision in the case of the husband, ante, 116. The petition set out a cause of action, and was good against the general and special demurrers; and the evidence authorized the verdict for the plaintiff. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer, and in overruling the defendant’s motion for new trial, which was based on the general grounds only.
Judgment affirmed.- Sutton and Felton, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.