Aikens v. State
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
MacIntyre, J.
The special grounds of the motion for new trial are abandoned in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error. The evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis, save the guilt of the accused. Whittemore v. State, 36 Ga. App. 299 ( 136 S. E. 806 ); Lamb v. State, 36 Ga. App. 306 ( 136 S. E. 306 ); Wynn v. State, 38 Ga. App. 262 ( 143 S. E. 599 ) ; Williams v. State, 41 Ga. App. 351 ( 152 S. E. 911 ); Johnson v. State, 41 Ga. App. 327 ( 152 S. E. 920 ); Craig v. State, 41 Ga. App. 225 ( 152 S. E. 494 ); Cook v. State, 33 Ga. App. 571 (2) ( 127 S. E. 156 ); Hale v. State, 50 *536 Ga. App. 99 ( 176 S. E. 919 ). The case of Wright v. State, 48 Ga. App. 302 ( 172 S. E. 687 ), is differentiated on. its facts from the present case.
Decided March 17, 1938.
Judgment affii-med.
Broyles, O. J., and Guerry, J., concur.
J. W. lennard, O. L. Harris, for plaintiff in error. Allan 0. Garden, solicitor-general, contra.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.