Rice v. State
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Broyles, C. J.
The accused was convicted of an assault with intent to rape; and his motion for new trial contained only the general grounds. The other two judges of the first division of this court are of the opinion that the verdict was authorized by the evidence. The view of the *16 writer is that the evidence authorized only a verdict for assault and battery.
Decided May 20, 1938. O. Grady Gillon, David R. Ramey, for plaintiff in error. Charles H. Garrell, solicitor-general, contra.
Judgment affirmed.
MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur. Broyles, O. J-, dissents.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.