Vandeviere v. State
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
MacIntyre, J.
The defendant was convicted of the offense of hog-stealing. His motion for new trial, based solely on the general grounds, was overruled and he excepted. Eeld:
1. After verdict, in passing upon the motion for a new trial, that view of the evidence which is most unfavorable to the accused must be taken, for every presumption and every inference is in favor of the verdict. Bell v. State, 21 Ga. App. 788 ( 95 S. E. 270 ).
2. The evidence authorized the verdict.
3. Although the evidence of the witnesses for the State contained contradictions, there was no abuse of discretion in denying a new trial. *19 Clemons v. State, 159 Ga. 425 ( 125 S. E. 800 ). See Davis v. State, 94 Ga. 399 ( 19 S. E. 243 ).
Decided May 20, 1938. B. L. Tipton, for plaintiff in error. ' W. G. Forehand!, solicitor-general, J. H. Pate, contra.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, G. J., and Querry, J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 21 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.