TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Smith v. International Ladies Garment Workers Union

Smith v. Int'l Ladies Garment Workers Union, 197 S.E. 349 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 21, 1938
Docket
No. 26820
Judges
Felton
Citations
197 S.E. 34958 Ga. App. 261938 Ga. App. LEXIS 174

Opinion of the Court — Felton

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Felton, J.

It was the intention of the legislature by acts codified (Code, §§ 22-409, 22-410, 22-411, 22-412 and 22-414) to provide under what circumstances any association of individuals could sue or be sued as an association; namely, that it must be incorporated or shall have entered the names of its trustees or officers, together with the name, style, and object of the association or society, on the records of the clerk of the superior court. The object of the record of the officers was to provide for the designation of representatives upon whom authorized service might be had, or who could institute legal proceedings in behalf of the society. The Code of 1933, § 22-414 (1910 § 2830), refers to § 22-412 (§ 2829). The Code, § 22-412, puts all societies in the same category. O’Jay Spread Co. v. Hicks, 186 Ga. 507 ( 195 S. E. 564 ) ; Wilkins v. Wardens &c. of St. Marks Church, 52 Ga. 351 ; Jones v. Watson, 63 Ga. 679 ; Thurmond v. Cedar Spring Baptist Church, 110 Ga. 816 ( 36 S. E. 221 ) ; Barbour v. Albany Lodge, 73 Ga. 474 ; Josey v. Union Loan, & Trust Co., 106 Ga. 608 ( 32 S. E. 628 ) ; Kelsey v. Jackson, 123 Ga. 113 ( 50 S. E. 951 ) ; Green v. Young Zion Baptist Church, 27 Ga. App. 572 ( 109 S. E. 517 ). An unincorporated labor union is such a society as is contemplated by the above-quoted sections of the Code, and is not subject to suit as an association of individuals, the suit not purporting to proceed against the members individually or as partners, and it not having been incorporated and net having had its name, style, objects, and the names of its trustees or officers recorded *27 as required by law. It was not error for the court, on motion, to dismiss the instant suit as to the three defendant unicoas.

Decided May 21, 1938. Irving 8. Nathan, for plaintiff. FranTc Constangy, Joseph Jacobs, Pml E. Johnson, George B. Bush, for defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., concurs. Sutton, J., concurs m the judgment.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1938: 11949: 11951: 119382026peak 1938 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 9

DepthCaseCited by
Josey v. Union Loan & Trust Co., 32 S.E. 628 (Ga. 1899) 17
Thurmond v. Cedar Spring Baptist Church, 36 S.E. 221 (Ga. 1900) 14
Kelsey v. Jackson, 50 S.E. 951 (Ga. 1905) 13
Green v. Young Zion Baptist Church, 109 S.E. 517 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921) 2
Barbour v. Albany Lodge, No. 24, 73 Ga. 474 (1884) 32
O'Jay Spread Co. v. Hicks, 195 S.E. 564 (Ga. 1937) 26
Regents of the Univ. Sys. v. Trust Co., 198 S.E. 345 (Ga. 1938) 18
Wilkins v. Wardens & Vestry of St. Mark's Protestant Episcopal Church, 52 Ga. 351 (1874) 10
Jones v. Watson, 63 Ga. 679 (1879) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list