TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mary C. Keener v. Department of the Army & Hon. Michael W.P. Stone, Secretary of the Army

Keener v. Dep't of the Army & Hon. Michael W.P. Stone, Sec'y of the Army, 956 F.2d 269 (6th Cir. 1992)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 24, 1992
Docket
No. 91-5442
Citations
956 F.2d 26958 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 9121992 WL 345801992 U.S. App. LEXIS 7856
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

956 F.2d 269 58 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 912

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Mary C. KEENER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY & Hon. Michael W.P. Stone, Secretary of the Army, Defendant-Appellees.

No. 91-5442.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 24, 1992.

Before BOGGS and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal arises out of an action filed by attorney David H. Parton to collect attorney fees for services he claimed were rendered in representing Mary C. Keener, and were due from the Department of the Army. The district court denied the request for fees and the imposed sanctions.

2

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and briefs of the parties, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in entering the order appealed from.

3

As the reasons why the order should have been entered have been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the order of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning set out by that court in its memorandum opinion of February 8, 1991.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1994: 12008: 12009: 12012: 119942026peak 1994 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Imwalle v. Reliance Medical Products, Inc.515 F.3d 531 (6th Cir. 2008)
  2. Williams v. Revlon Co.156 F.R.D. 39 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)
  3. Healthcall of Detroit, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance632 F. Supp. 2d 676 (E.D. Mich. 2009)
  4. Zarwasch-Weiss v. SKF Economos USA, Inc.838 F. Supp. 2d 654 (N.D. Ohio 2012)

Most recent

  1. Zarwasch-Weiss v. SKF Economos USA, Inc.838 F. Supp. 2d 654 (N.D. Ohio 2012)
  2. Healthcall of Detroit, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance632 F. Supp. 2d 676 (E.D. Mich. 2009)
  3. Imwalle v. Reliance Medical Products, Inc.515 F.3d 531 (6th Cir. 2008)
  4. Williams v. Revlon Co.156 F.R.D. 39 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list