Harris v. Mayes
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Qtjillian, J.
1. The filing of an amendment which has no prayer that it be made a part of the petition does not of itself make such amendment a part of the record, but where the amendment was tendered and an order passed directing that it be filed subject to the right of the defendant to demur, the defendant did renew his demurrers, and the judge overruled the demurrers to the petition as amended, the amendment will be treated as having been formally allowed. Newill v. Atlanta Gas-Light Co., 48 Ga. App. 226 ( 172 S. E. 232 ).
2. Under the holdings in Mason v. Frankel, 49 Ga. App. 145 (2) ( 174 S. E. 546 ), and King Hdw. Co. v. Teplis, 91 Ga. App. 13 ( 84 S. E. 2d 686 ), the general demurrer was properly overruled by the judge of the superior court.
3. The special demurrers are without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Felton, C. J., and Nichols, J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.