TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Medders v. State

Medders v. State, 110 S.E.2d 709 (Ga. Ct. App. 1959)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
September 23, 1959
Docket
No. 37904
Judges
Gardner
Citations
110 S.E.2d 709100 Ga. App. 2161959 Ga. App. LEXIS 579

Opinion of the Court — Gardner

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Gardner, Presiding Judge.

Ernest M. Medders was convicted by a jury in the Criminal Court of Fulton County for the *217 offense of abandonment of his minor child. His certiorari to the Superior Court of Fulton County was overruled and it is on this judgment that the case is here for review.

Decided September 23, 1959. Francis Y. Fije, for plaintiff in error. Paul Webb, Solicitor-General, John I. Kelley, Solicitor, Robert O’Neil, Eugene L. Tiller, contra.

In the record there is sworn testimony that the mother of the child received nothing from the defendant for the support of the minor child from the time the child was bom until the defendant was drafted into the Army. About the time the defendant went into the Army the mother applied to the Red Cross, which organization arranged that the defendant pay an allotment out of his Army pay. The defendant’s wife obtained a divorce from him while he was in the Army and she subsequently married William Allyn Jones. Mrs. Jones petitioned ■ for a change in the name of the minor child concerned here, such name to be changed from Medders to Jones.

The chief defense of the defendant is that the reason he did not pay any alimony for the support of the minor child in question was that there was a virtual adoption of the minor child by Jones. The jury found against the defendant on this question and also found to the effect that the defendant had abandoned the minor child under the provisions of Code § 74-9902. The evidence in the case fully justifies the verdict as to the virtual adoption and as to the abandonment.

On the trial of the certiorari the Superior Court of Fulton County ■ committed no reversible error in denying it.

Jitdgment affirmed.

Townsend and Carlisle, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1971: 119712026peak 1971 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Robinson v. State254 So. 2d 379 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

Most recent

  1. Robinson v. State254 So. 2d 379 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list