TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Whitus v. State

WHITUS v. THE STATE DAVIS v. State

Whitus v. State, 145 S.E.2d 83 (Ga. Ct. App. 1965)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
September 8, 1965
Docket
Nos. 41420; 41421
Judges
Nichols
Citations
145 S.E.2d 83112 Ga. App. 3281965 Ga. App. LEXIS 693

Opinion of the Court — Nichols

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

These cases were appealed to the Supreme Court and transferred by that court to this court. Both defendants were indicted for murder but before such indictments were returned each defendant filed a challenge to the array of the grand jury based upon the deliberate exclusion and inclusion of negroes on the grand jury. After hearing evidence upon the issue thus made the trial court overruled the challenges to the array and it is on such judgment that the plaintiffs in error now assign error, as well as on a judgment during the trial wherein the trial court excluded documentary evidence described by counsel offering the same as “the 1960 Census of Population, Volume 1, characteristics of the Population Part 12, Georgia, United States Department of Commerce, and more specifically table 27 as it applies to Mitchell County, Georgia, wherein it shows a total population in the county of persons over 21 as being 10,206, of which 5,726 are white and 4,480 are colored.” Held:

1. Both the trial court and this court will take judicial notice of the United States Census (see Tift v. Bush, 209 Ga. 769 ( 75 SE2d 805 )), and while the admission of evidence “to refresh the court’s memory” would not be reversible error (see Fields v. Jackson, 102 Ga. App. 117, 128 ( 115 SE2d 877 )), the *329 exclusion of evidence of a fact of which, the court takes judicial notice in the hearing before the court without the intervention of a jury is not harmful error.

Argued July 7, 1965 Decided September 8, 1965 Rehearing denied September 22, 1965. P. Walter Jones, B. Clarence Mayfield, for plaintiffs in error. Fred B. Hand, Jr., Solicitor General, contra.

2. The remaining contentions of the plaintiffs in error are controlled by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Brookins v. State, 221 Ga. 181 ( 144 SE2d 83 ), and under such decision show no reversible error.

Judgments affirmed.

Eberhardt and Parnell, J.J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1966: 219662026peak 1966 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Whitus v. Georgia385 U.S. 545 (1966)
  2. Whitus v. State149 S.E.2d 138 (Ga. 1966)

Most recent

  1. Whitus v. Georgia385 U.S. 545 (1966)
  2. Whitus v. State149 S.E.2d 138 (Ga. 1966)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Fields v. Jackson, 115 S.E.2d 877 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960) 38
Brookins v. State, 144 S.E.2d 83 (Ga. 1965) 14
Tift v. Bush, 75 S.E.2d 805 (Ga. 1953) 12

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list