Ehik v. Piper
EHIK v. PIPER and vice versa
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per curiam.
These appeals are from orders denying a motion for summary judgment filed by both the plaintiff and the defendant. The trial judge certified that the orders should be subject to review. Plaintiff sued for damages growing out of a collision between the automobile he was driving and an automobile driven by the son of the defendant.
There being a genuine issue on one or more material facts, the trial court did not err in overruling both motions for summary judgment.
Judgments affirmed.
Hall, P. J., Deen and Evans, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.