TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hartford Insurance v. Mobley

HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY v. MOBLEY

Hartford Ins. v. Mobley, 297 S.E.2d 312 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 10, 1982
Docket
No. 64568
Judges
Shulman
Citations
297 S.E.2d 312164 Ga. App. 3631982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2802

Opinion of the Court — Shulman

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Shulman, Presiding Judge.

Appellant brought this action to recover damages caused by appellees to property insured by appellant. Appellees filed no answer. Appellant made out a case for damages before the trial court pursuant to Code Ann. § 81A-155 (a) (OCGA § 9-11-55 (a)). The trial court awarded the damages requested with the exception of attorney fees sought under the provisions of Code Ann. § 20-1404 (OCGA § 13-6-11). The reason given by the trial court for denying attorney fees was that the grant of such expenses is discretionary and that the trial court, in the exercise of that discretion, denied the claim. The sole enumeration of error on appeal is the trial court’s refusal to award attorney fees in any amount.

Under this court’s holding in Brannon Enterprises, Inc. v. Deaton, 159 Ga. App. 685 ( 285 SE2d 58 ), we are constrained to rule that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s claim for attorney fees. Here, as in Brannon Enterprises, the defendants did not respond in any way to appellant’s claim for damages. Therefore, as a matter of law, appellees put appellant to unnecessary trouble and expense within the meaning of Code Ann. § 20-1404.

In Brannon Enterprises, this court affirmed the trial court’s ruling that the plaintiff could not rely on the allegations of the complaint to establish the amount of reasonable attorney fees and remanded the case for further consideration of the amount of attorney fees to be awarded. Here, however, appellant did present evidence of the amount of reasonable attorney fees. Evidence of customary fees, such as the evidence offered by appellant in the present case, is the proper standard in assessing reasonable attorney fees. Good Housekeeping Shops v. Hines, 150 Ga. App. 240 (5) ( 257 SE2d 205 ). This case must, therefore, be remanded to the trial court with direction that the trial court enter judgment for appellant for attorney fees in an amount consistent with the evidence adduced before the trial court.

*364 Decided November 10, 1982. Stephen H. Harris, for appellant. Delton Mobley, Vickie A. Mobley, pro se.

Judgment reversed with direction.

Quillian, C. J., concurs. Carley, J., concurs in the judgment only.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1989: 11992: 12012: 119892026peak 1989 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Floyd v. First Union National Bank417 S.E.2d 725 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)
  2. Water's Edge Plantation Homeowner's Ass'n v. Reliford727 S.E.2d 234 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012)
  3. Harbor Light Marina v. Ellis378 S.E.2d 746 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)

Most recent

  1. Water's Edge Plantation Homeowner's Ass'n v. Reliford727 S.E.2d 234 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012)
  2. Floyd v. First Union National Bank417 S.E.2d 725 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)
  3. Harbor Light Marina v. Ellis378 S.E.2d 746 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Brannon Enters. v. Deaton, 285 S.E.2d 58 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981) 27
Good Housekeeping Shops v. Hines, 257 S.E.2d 205 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list