Kientz v. Harris

VICTOR VINCENT KIENTZ v. ARTHUR O'DELL HARRIS

Kientz v. Harris, 256 P.2d 995 (Cal. Ct. App. 1953)

Court: California Court of Appeal · State Appellate Courts
Decided: May 15, 1953
Docket: No. Civ. No. 8417
Judges: Dyke
Citations: 256 P.2d 995117 Cal. App. 2d 8101953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1886

Cited by 1

Opinion of the Court — Dyke

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

VAN DYKE, P. J.

In Kientz v. Harris, 3 Civil No. 8418 (ante, p. 787 [ 257 P.2d 41 ]) we held that upon the facts stated the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction in this court to entertain the same. Motion to dismiss this appeal has been made upon the same ground. The facts in each case as to jurisdiction are identical. There is no need, therefore, to file an extended opinion herein.

Upon the authority of that case, the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal herein is dismissed.

Peek, J., and Sehottky, J., concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 1 case

View all citing references →

State Appellate Courts1

Relies on it most ⓘ

Smith v. Big Horn Mining Co.332 P.2d 191 (Cal. Ct. App. 1958)

Most recent

Smith v. Big Horn Mining Co.332 P.2d 191 (Cal. Ct. App. 1958)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Kientz v. Harris, 257 P.2d 41 (Cal. Ct. App. 1953)	15

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list