TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Camellia A. Blackwell v. Prince George's Community College Robert I. Bickford, President Board of Trustees

Blackwell v. Prince George's Cmty. Coll., 960 F.2d 145 (4th Cir. 1992)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 17, 1992
Docket
No. 92-1028
Citations
960 F.2d 1451992 WL 772821992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17017
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

960 F.2d 145

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Camellia A. BLACKWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COMMUNITY COLLEGE; Robert I. Bickford, President; Board of Trustees, Defendants-Appellees.

92-1028.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 6, 1992

April 17, 1992

Camellia A. Blackwell, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Ellis Bers, Anthony Victor Teelucksingh, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Camellia A. Blackwell appeals the district court's order denying her Motion to Amend a Complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.s 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

2

Therefore, we grant Appellees' motion to dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949) 8,958

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list