The State Of Oklahoma v. Environmental Protection Agency
The State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Scenic Rivers Commission and Pollution Control Coordinating Board, Save the Illinois River (Stir), a Non-Profit Corporation of the State of Oklahoma, City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, the Beaver Water District, State of Arkansas, Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology v. Environmental Protection Agency, Oklahoma Wildlife Federation, Intervenor
Opinion
962 F.2d 996 34 ERC 1752
The STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Oklahoma Scenic Rivers Commission and Pollution Control Coordinating Board, Save the Illinois River (STIR), a non-profit corporation of the State of Oklahoma, City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, the Beaver Water District, State of Arkansas, Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology, Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent, Oklahoma Wildlife Federation, Intervenor.
Nos. 89-9503, 89-9507 and 89-9516.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
April 27, 1992.
On reversal from the United States Supreme Court (Supreme Court Nos. 90-1262 and 90-1266).
Before ANDERSON and BRORBY, Circuit Judges, and THEIS, * District Judge.
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
1
We originally decided this case in an opinion found at 908 F.2d 595 (10th Cir.1990), in which this court construed the Clean Water Act as prohibiting any discharge of effluent that would reach waters already in violation of existing water quality standards.
2
The Supreme Court granted certiorari and in an opinion issued February 26, 1992, reversed the decision of this court. --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 1046 , 117 L.Ed.2d 239 (1992).
3
We therefore AFFIRM the decision of the Environmental Protection Agency and REMAND this case to the Environmental Protection Agency.
* The Honorable Frank G. Theis, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Kansas, sitting by designation
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.