In re the Arbitration between Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. & Clarke Baridon, Inc.
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation, and Clarke Baridon, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Orders unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. Specifically excluded from the arbitration clause were disputes for which provision for determination was otherwise made in the agreement. Since such a provision for determination of disputes as to the claims made by the subcontractor herein is included in another part of the agreement, there is no contract to arbitrate them. Hence, a stay of the arbitration was properly granted. We do not consider whether appellant has any alternate remedy. All we decide is that the matter in dispute is not arbitrable under the express terms of the contract. Concur—Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, Valente and Bastow, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.