TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Calautti v. National Transportation Co.

Salvatore Calautti v. National Transportation Co., Inc.

Calautti v. Nat'l Transp. Co., 10 A.D.2d 955 (1960)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 9, 1960
Citations
10 A.D.2d 955201 N.Y.S.2d 5581960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10148

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

In an action to recover damages for injuries to person and property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered September 9, 1959, denying his motion to amend the complaint so as to allege the total and permanent loss of his earning capacity, and to increase the demand for damages from $50,000 to $1,000,000. The action was commenced in 1951. A bill of particulars served in 1955> alleged loss of earnings of $200,000. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The plaintiff shall serve and file a copy of the amended complaint within 10 days after the entry of the order hereon. In this record defendants do not dispute plaintiff’s claim that, subsequent to the service of the original complaint, he ascertained that he was totally and permanently disabled and could never again be gainfully employed. There is no proof of actual prejudice to defendants. Under these circumstances, the motion should have been granted (Nagle v. Bryn Mawr Ridge, Inc., 7 A D 2d 1007). The mere lapse of time is not a sufficient ground for denial (Nathanson v. Lutheran Hosp. Assn., 3 Misc 2d 540 ). If so advised, after service of the amended complaint, defendants may move for further physical examination of the plaintiff. Beldock, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1978: 11979: 31980: 319782026peak 1979 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Scarcella v. Dunn103 Misc. 2d 31 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1980)
  2. Wagner v. Huntington Hospital65 A.D.2d 771 (1978)
  3. Hillenbrand v. 3801 Review Place, Inc.72 A.D.2d 554 (1979)
  4. Hampton v. Lefkowitz72 A.D.2d 805 (1979)
  5. Brewster v. City of New York78 A.D.2d 667 (1980)
  6. Fling v. McGregor, Swire Air Services, Ltd.67 A.D.2d 901 (1979)

Most recent

  1. Brewster v. City of New York78 A.D.2d 667 (1980)
  2. Harris v. Pullman's Bar & Grill, Inc.74 A.D.2d 818 (1980) · Dissent
  3. Scarcella v. Dunn103 Misc. 2d 31 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1980)
  4. Hampton v. Lefkowitz72 A.D.2d 805 (1979)
  5. Hillenbrand v. 3801 Review Place, Inc.72 A.D.2d 554 (1979)
  6. Fling v. McGregor, Swire Air Services, Ltd.67 A.D.2d 901 (1979)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Nathanson v. Lutheran Hosp. Ass'n, 3 Misc. 2d 540 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1956) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list