TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People ex rel. Wilkinson v. McMann

The People of the State of New York ex rel. Charles J. Wilkinson, against Daniel McMann, as Warden of Clinton Prison

People ex rel. Wilkinson v. McMann, 11 A.D.2d 569 (1960)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 16, 1960
Citations
11 A.D.2d 569200 N.Y.S.2d 8881960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9915

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Appeal from an order of the 'Clinton County Court which dismissed a writ of habeas corpus. On July 15, 1949 relator was convicted in Monroe County Court of grand larceny in the first degree. Sentence was deferred until July 28, 1949, when sentence was suspended. On February 1, 1950 relator was returned to court, the suspension of sentence was revoked and he was sentenced to six months imprisonment in the Monroe County Penitentiary. Relator sought in the court below to vitiate this conviction (used as a part basis for subsequent multiple offender sentences) on the ground of failure to comply with sections 472, 4801 and 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on February 1, 1950, the date when suspension of sentence was revoked. Relator concedes that there was a compliance with section 480 when he appeared for sentence on July 28, 1949. The record clearly shows a compliance with sections 472 and 482 on that date. These sections relate solely to “judgment day” which is the day a defendant appears for sentence, and no other. (People ex rel. Miller v. Martin, 1 N Y 2d 406.) There is no requirement in the Code of Criminal Procedure that the process be repeated on proceedings pertaining to the judgment subsequently. Order unanimously affirmed. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list