People v. Finkelstein
The People of the State of New York v. Louis Finkelstein, Joseph Kleinberg, Nathan Goldstein, Louis Schaeffer and Herman H. Schenkman
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Judgments of conviction unanimously affirmed. It is not clear that People v. Engel (7 N Y 2d 1002) determined that section 1141 of the Penal Law in its present form is unconstitutional. The decision is supportable by the absence in that case of any proof which would supply the element of scienter. In the absence of further clarification by the highest court of the State the statute may be construed to require scienter and thus satisfy the requirements laid down in Smith v. California ( 361 U. S. 147 ). People v. Shapiro (6 A D 2d 271) is not dispositive of the question before this court because the decision is not controlling in this Department and because the decision is not one in the highest court of the State (cf. Smith v. California, supra, p. 149 , especially footnote 2). Assuming the validity of the statute the books in question come under its condemnation. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.