Faroll v. National Surety Corp.
Berenice D. Faroll, as Executors of Joseph Faroll v. National Surety Corporation
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Order, entered on November 23, 1960, granting plaintiffs’ motion to strike five complete and one partial defense from defendant’s answer to the amended complaint, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts to the extent of reinstating the partial defense, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The five separate' complete defenses were properly Stricken from the answer. The matters alleged therein may be proved under the general denials in the pleading. Special Term erred, however, in granting the motion to strike the partial defense. It might develop at the trial that the partial defense is sufficient. We pass upon no other question or issue. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Bastow, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.