Walsh v. Henning
John A. Walsh v. Aloysius J. Henning
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
In an action for an accounting, and for Other relief, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 23, 1961, which denied his motion, made under rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to strike out as insufficient in law the affirmative defense of the Statutes of Limitations and the Statutes of Fraud contained in paragraphs three to eight of defendants’ answers. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur. [ 31 Misc 2d 871 .]
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.