TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Raffa v. Central School District No. 1

Paula F. Raffa v. Central School District No. 1 of the Towns of Cairo, Durham, Athens, Catskill, Coxsackie and Greenville, County of Greene

Raffa v. Cent. Sch. Dist. No. 1, 16 A.D.2d 855 (1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 9, 1962
Citations
16 A.D.2d 855227 N.Y.S.2d 7231962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9906

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Appeal from a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury rendered at a Trial Term, Supreme Court, Greene County, and from an order denying a motion to set aside the verdict. Plaintiff paid admission to attend a public basketball game in the school premises owned by the defendant school district and after the game went into the school cafeteria where she bought some food. While seated at a table, the chair gave way and collapsed and she was thrown to the floor, sustaining a herniated intervertebral disc and some injuries to the muscles. Since the chair was in the full control of the defendant and furnished to the plaintiff as a business invitee on the premises, a prima facie showing of negligence was made out when it was shown that the chair collapsed in ordinary use by the plaintiff (Reinzi v. Tilyou, 252 N. Y. 97 ; Goodacre v. Roovers Bros., 254 App. Div. 764 ; Lusk v. Peck, 132 App. Div. 426 ). Although a question of fact arose as to whether or not there should be a recovery, and the case was properly submitted to the jury, the verdict for defendant is against the weight of the evidence in view of the collapse of the defendant’s chair, unexplained by it, and the absence of any negligence shown in the way the plaintiff used the chair. On this issue there should, in our view of the record, be a new trial. There was, however, no basis for the motion by plaintiff for a new trial based on a purported untruthful answer by a juror on preliminary examination of the jury and on a purported statement by one of the jurors after the trial. The Judge was entirely right in denying a motion to set aside the verdict on those grounds. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1969: 11978: 21992: 12021: 119692026peak 1978 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Finocchio v. Crest Hollow Club at Woodbury, Inc.184 A.D.2d 491 (1992)
  2. Gresham v. Stouffer Corp.241 S.E.2d 451 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
  3. Kowalski v. Loblaws, Inc.61 A.D.2d 340 (1978)
  4. Hunter v. Alfina251 N.E.2d 303 (Ill. App. Ct. 1969)
  5. Draper v. State of New York2021 NY Slip Op 04163

Most recent

  1. Draper v. State of New York2021 NY Slip Op 04163
  2. Finocchio v. Crest Hollow Club at Woodbury, Inc.184 A.D.2d 491 (1992)
  3. Kowalski v. Loblaws, Inc.61 A.D.2d 340 (1978)
  4. Gresham v. Stouffer Corp.241 S.E.2d 451 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
  5. Hunter v. Alfina251 N.E.2d 303 (Ill. App. Ct. 1969)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Lusk v. Peck, 132 A.D. 426 (1909) 29
Reinzi v. Tilyou, 169 N.E. 101 (N.Y. 1929) 20
Goodacre v. Roovers Bros., 254 A.D. 764 (1938) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list