TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Walter L. Green v. Officer Holmes Sergeant Ellis

Green v. Holmes Sergeant Ellis, 972 F.2d 339 (4th Cir. 1992)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
August 4, 1992
Docket
No. 92-6467
Citations
972 F.2d 3391992 WL 1836991992 U.S. App. LEXIS 26854
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

972 F.2d 339

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Walter L. GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer HOLMES; Sergeant Ellis, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6467.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 1992 Decided: August 4, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. B. Waugh Crigler, Magistrate Judge. (CA-91-535-R)

Walter L. Green, Appellant Pro Se.

William Rundahl Coleman, Office of The Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

Dismissed.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Walter L. Green noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), and failed to move for an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Browder v. Dir., 434 U.S. 257 (1978) 3,111
United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220 (1960) 1,839

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list