TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Joseph B. Shumate, Jr. v. G. S. Agee

Shumate v. G. S. Agee, 972 F.2d 341 (4th Cir. 1992)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 30, 1992
Docket
No. 91-1810
Citations
972 F.2d 3411992 WL 1801051992 U.S. App. LEXIS 26739
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

972 F.2d 341

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Joseph B. SHUMATE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G. S. AGEE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-1810.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1992 Decided: July 30, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-91-512-R, BK-7-84-00549-RKR)

Joseph B. Shumate, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

G. S. Agee, Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, Aheron & Agee, Roanoke, Virginia, Appellee.

W.D.Va.

Dismissed.

Before PHILLIPS and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Joseph B. Shumate, Jr., a Chapter 7 debtor, appeals from the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order awarding interim attorney's fees in the amount of $22,896.60 for legal services performed for the trustee of Shumate's bankruptcy estate. This Court has jurisdiction over appeals from final orders of the district court entered in appeals from the bankruptcy court. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 158 (d) (1968 & Supp. 1992). District court orders affirming interim fee awards are not final and thus not appealable to the Court of Appeals. See In re Stable Mews Assocs., 778 F.2d 121, 122-24 (2d Cir. 1985); In re Callister, 673 F.2d 305 , 306-07 (10th Cir. 1982). Finding no basis for appellate jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Stable Mews Associates. Stable Mews Associates v. Togut, 778 F.2d 121 (2d Cir. 1985) 63

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list