TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Merritt Corp. v. Bass

Merritt Corporation v. Milton A. Bass, Doing Business under the Name of Bass & Friend

Merritt Corp. v. Bass, 17 A.D.2d 735 (1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
September 27, 1962
Citations
17 A.D.2d 735232 N.Y.S.2d 3301962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7995

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Order, entered on January 16, 1962, unanimously modified on the law and on the facts, without costs, to provide that the compensation of the Referee appointed by the order entered November 30, 1961, shall be borne in the first instance by the parties jointly, and the amount paid by any party may be taxable or allowable as costs and disbursements herein to the extent provided or authorized by statute; and to further provide that the deposit or additional undertaking directed to be made or filed by the plaintiff shall secure the payments herein directed to be made by plaintiff and any and all costs taxed or allowed as against plaintiff; and the order of November 30, 1961, is modified accordingly; and the order, entered January 12, 1962, is otherwise affirmed, without costs. Under the special circumstances here, it was proper for Special Term, in the exercise of its discretion, to appoint a Referee to conduct the examinations before trial. We do not construe the order of the court as placing upon the plaintiff final responsibility for payment in full of all compensation allowed to the Referee. It is certainly not clear that the court intended at this time to direct the payment by plaintiff of such compensation. In any event, on the record here, such a direction would not be justified. The direction in the order requiring plaintiff to furnish additional security for costs was proper (Civ. Prae. Act, § 1528), and it was also proper to direct dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint in the event the security was not furnished (Civ. Prae. Act, § 1529). Settle order on notice. Concur-—Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1979: 119792026peak 1979 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Baker v. General Mills Fun Group, Inc.101 Misc. 2d 193 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1979)

Most recent

  1. Baker v. General Mills Fun Group, Inc.101 Misc. 2d 193 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1979)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list