People v. Nettingham
The People of the State of New York v. John Nettingham
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered April 22,1960 after a jury trial, convicting him of (a) possession of a narcotic with intent to sell; and (b) sale of a narcotic (Penal Law, § 1751, subds. 1, 2), and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. In the absence of objection on constitutional grounds, or inquiry indicating that the lawfulness of the alleged search and seizure is questioned, the defendant, on an appeal, may not take advantage of the determination in Mapp v. Ohio ( 367 U. S. 643 ). (See People v. Loria, 10 N Y 2d 368; People v. Friola, 11 N Y 2d 157; People v. O’Neill, 11 N Y 2d 148.) Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.