Rochester Park, Inc. v. City of Rochester
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
— Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: While section 508 ultimately might be found to be unambiguous, “ Even in the ease of an integrated written contract, the meaning of the words may depend upon various surrounding circumstances that are in dispute; the circumstances must be found as a fact before interpretation can proceed.” (3 Corbin, Contracts, § 554, p. 223.) We pass on no other questions. (Appeal from order of Monroe, Special Term, denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment and for a. declaratory judgment.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ. [ 38 Misc 2d 714 .]
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 12 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals1
- Federal District Courts3
- State Highest Courts2
- State Appellate Courts5
- State Trial Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.