TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Moseson v. Blau

Lillian Moseson v. Ephriam J. Blau

Moseson v. Blau, 20 A.D.2d 622 (1963)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
December 12, 1963
Citations
20 A.D.2d 622244 N.Y.S.2d 8861963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2738

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts in accordance with the memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Order entered December 7, 1962, vacated as improperly granted. Memorandum: The judgment should be modified by striking the paragraphs thereof numbered 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6. In the last four numbered paragraphs relief was granted which was neither demanded in the complaint, nor supported by proof at the trial, nor authorized by the decision. Moreover, the declaration in paragraph 1 of the judgment is not consistent with the conclusions of law. In place thereof there should be substituted an adjudication that plaintiff, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 6 of the lease, is entitled to receive such amounts as represent the difference between (a) the amount paid for taxes which were levied against the demised premises for the fiscal year February 1, 1950-January 31, 1951 and (b) the amounts which are levied for each of the fiscal years, February 1, 1960-January 31, 1961 through the fiscal year February 1, 1969-January 31, 1970, inclusive. The judgment should further provide that the counterclaim of defendant be dismissed. Lastly, the order entered December 7, 1962 should be vacated. The trial court was without authority to grant such relief in the light of the pleadings, the proof and the findings of fact and conclusions of law. (Appeal from a judgment and order of Steuben Trial Term for plaintiff in an action for a declaratory judgment as to a clause in a lease.) Present—• Bastow, J. P., Goldman, McClusky, Henry and Noonan, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list