Baron v. Baron
Richard W. Baron v. Pamela S. Baron
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Order, entered October 15, 1963, granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not sufficiently state a cause of action unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-respondent. The determination is, of course, without prejudice to plaintiff pleading in any other action, if he can, a proper cause of action which alleges ultimate facts that the Mexican judgment and the separation agreement were invalid, by reason of duress or otherwise. Concur—Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.