TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Colon

The People of the State of New York v. Domingo Colon

People v. Colon, 20 A.D.2d 854 (1964)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 2, 1964
Citations
20 A.D.2d 854248 N.Y.S.2d 1691964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4097

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Judgment of the Court of General Sessions, New York County, rendered on December 11, 1961, convicting defendant after trial before a jury of two counts of feloniously selling a narcotic drug and sentencing him to serve a minimum of 7% years and a maximum of 10 years in State prison on each of said counts, the sentences to run consecutively, unanimously modified, on the facts, the law and in the exercise of discretion to the extent that the sentences will run concurrently instead of consecutively, and the judgment is otherwise affirmed. Some of the questions addressed to witnesses by the Trial Judge and some of the observations he made, while motivated by an evident desire to enlighten the jury and not to prejudice the defendant, were unfortunate and unnecessary; but they could not substantially have affected the outcome of the trial. The sentence imposed, however, was excessive, inasmuch as the evidence upon the trial and a reading of the probation report indicate that defendant was a small-scale seller of narcotics and that he had no previous record of arrest or conviction upon a narcotics charge. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1966: 119662026peak 1966 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Follette366 F.2d 775 (2d Cir. 1966)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Follette366 F.2d 775 (2d Cir. 1966)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list