TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Franklin National Bank v. Wall Street Commercial Corp.

Franklin National Bank v. Wall Street Commercial Corporation

Franklin Nat'l Bank v. Wall St. Commercial Corp., 21 A.D.2d 878 (1964)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
July 1, 1964
Citations
21 A.D.2d 878251 N.Y.S.2d 8921964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3384

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

In an action upon a promissory note in the face amount of $90,000, containing a provision which requires the debtor to pay all costs and expenses of any action to enforce the note, plus an attorney’s fees of 20% of the principal sum, the plaintiff bank appeals: (1) from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 18, 1963, as denied its motion for summary judgment on its cause of action for attorney’s fees in the sum of $18,000 and, instead, ordered a severance thereof and directed that the issue as to the reasonableness of said fees be determined upon a hearing; and (2) from so much of the judgment entered December 26, 1963 upon said order in its favor, as failed to include as part of its recovery the amount of said attorney’s fees. Order and judgment, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. In denying the motion, the Special Term held that while 20% of the unpaid balance of a note may be considered reasonable in a particular ease (citing General Lbr. Corp. v. Landa, 13 A D 2d 804, where the principal sum was approximately $2,000 and the attorney’s fee $400), in the instant case a factual issue is presented as to the reasonableness of the stipulated charge (see 40 Misc 2d 1003 ). We affirm upon that ground. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 18 cases

View all citing references →
1976: 51977: 21978: 21979: 11980: 11981: 11983: 11984: 11987: 11990: 11991: 11994: 119762026peak 1976 · 5

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Banca Della Svizzera Italiana v. Cohen756 F. Supp. 805 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)
  2. Equitable Lumber Corp. v. IPA Land Development Corp.344 N.E.2d 391 (N.Y. 1976)
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Forte94 A.D.2d 59 (1983)
  4. Mead v. First Trust & Deposit Co.60 A.D.2d 71 (1977)
  5. European American Bank v. Abramoff201 A.D.2d 611 (1994)
  6. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Park Lane Realty Associates72 A.D.2d 788 (1979)

Most recent

  1. European American Bank v. Abramoff201 A.D.2d 611 (1994)
  2. Banca Della Svizzera Italiana v. Cohen756 F. Supp. 805 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)
  3. National Bank v. ESI Group, Inc.167 A.D.2d 453 (1990)
  4. Headquarters Rest. Corp. v. Reliance Vending Co.133 A.D.2d 444 (1987)
  5. Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co. v. Seale101 A.D.2d 813 (1984)
  6. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Forte94 A.D.2d 59 (1983)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Franklin Nat'l Bank v. Wall St. Commercial Corp., 40 Misc. 2d 1003 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1963) 15

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list