TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Connors v. Howard Stores Corp.

John P. Connors v. Howard Stores Corporation

Connors v. Howard Stores Corp., 23 A.D.2d 686 (1965)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 22, 1965
Citations
23 A.D.2d 686257 N.Y.S.2d 6081965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4610

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

'In an action by a former employee against bis corporate employer and -the trustees of a “Retirement Plan” for its employees, to declare the plaintiff’s rights under said Plan, and for incidental relief, the plaintiff appeals, -as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered October 11, 1962 after a non-jury trial upon the opinion-decision of ia Special Referee, as “ fixed plaintiff’s rights under -the Plan as of .the date of actual retirement ” .and as “ denied him the right to recover the employer’s contributions to the Plan,” amounting to $9,092.17, which had been made for his .account, Judgment, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. Plaintiff voluntarily left his employment on January 22, 1960, prior to having attained the age for retirement under the Plan, which had been established in 1950. Before such termination of his employment the plaintiff had been notified by the employer that, pursuant to its reserved right to amend the Plan and effective December 1, 1959, it bad eliminated a provision (which it had -previously adopted Dec. 1, 1958) under which an employee could resign prior to the -age for retirement and obtain la cash payment >of his own -contributions plus the employer’s contributions to the fund applicable to him, In our -opinion, under -the circumstances here, the employer’s exercise of its reserved power to amend was effective to prevent the plaintiff from -obtaining a vested or contractual right -to the employer’s -prior contributions to the fund. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1970: 11971: 11972: 11977: 12002: 119702026peak 1970 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list