TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Murphy v. Colonial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

In the Matter of Edmund J. Murphy v. Colonial Federal Savings and Loan Association, Appellants In the Matter of William A. Colletti v. Colonial Federal Savings and Loan Association

Murphy v. Colonial Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 24 A.D.2d 482 (1965)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 14, 1965
Citations
24 A.D.2d 482261 N.Y.S.2d 2791965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3945

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

In two separate proceedings by different petitioners to obtain an inspection of records of Colonial Federal Savings and Loan Association (a corporation) and for other relief, the corporation and certain of its named officers appeal, as limited by their brief: (1) from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, entered January 29, 1965, in each proceeding, as granted to the respective petitioners the opportunity to inspect and to make copies of the shareholder and member list of said corporation, or, in the alternative, permitted appellants to furnish such list to the respective petitioners within 20 days; and (2) from an order of said court, entered February 26, 1965 in each such proceeding, which resettled the prior order by adding thereto provisions respecting the time and place of such inspection and copy by the petitioners. A cross appeal by the respective petitioners from the same orders was withdrawn upon the argument. In each proceeding, appeal from order of January 29, 1965 dismissed. Said order was superseded by the later order of February 26, 1965. In each proceeding, order of February 26, 1965, insofar as appealed from, affirmed (Matter of Ochs [Washington Hgts. Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn.], N. Y. L. J., Jan. 14, 1965, p. 14, col. 4). The appellants’ time to furnish voluntarily to the respective petitioners the list as provided in said orders is extended until 30 days after entry of the order hereon. Upon appellants’ default in furnishing such list, the inspections shall proceed on 10 days’ written notices to be given by'said petitioners or at such times and places as the parties may mutually fix by written stipulation. Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list