TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Di Rosse v. Wein

Carmella Di Rosse v. Melvin Wein

Di Rosse v. Wein, 24 A.D.2d 510 (1965)
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 28, 1965
Citations
24 A.D.2d 510261 N.Y.S.2d 6231965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3762

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

In a malpractice action against a physiean, to recover damages for personal injury sustained by the plaintiff wife, and for medical expenses and loss of services by her husband, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered October 21, 1964 after trial, upon the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiffs. Judgment affirmed, with costs. It was virtually undisputed that the plaintiff wife was caused to suffer from a condition known as exfoliative dermatitis as a result of a series of injections by defendant of a gold compound during the course of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. It also appeared that the medical profession recognized the possibility of undesirable reactions in the use of gold therapy. We are of the opinion that, under the facts and circumstances disclosed by this record, including the fact that no immediate emergency existed, defendant was obligated to make a reasonable disclosure to his patient of the known dangers which were incident to or possible in the proposed use of gold; and that the trial court, therefore, did not err in charging, in substance, that defendant could be found guilty of malpractice if he failed in that duty (cf. Natanson v. Kline, 186 Kan. 393 , rehearing den. 187 Kan. 186 ; Mitchell v. Robinson, 334 S. W. 2d 11 [Mo.]). We are also of the opinion that, on the facts presented, *511 the court’s participation in the examination of witnesses, and the court’s charge, were not prejudicial to defendant (cf. Spinelli v. Tickle Eng. Works, 272 App. Div. 1032 , affd. 297 N. Y. 818 ). While defendant asserts that evidence on the question of the failure to disclose possible dangers in the treatment was not within the allegations of the pleadings, there was no objection to the evidence on that ground upon the trial (cf. Charlton v. Rose, 24 App. Div. 485 ; Uertz v. Singer Mfg. Co., 35 Hun 116 ); and the pleadings will be deemed amended to conform to the proof (CPLR 3025[e], 5019[a] ; Thorne Neal & Co. v. New York So. Coal Term. Corp., 270 App. Div. 816 , affd. 295 N. Y. 977 ). Beldoek, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 15 cases

View all citing references →
1965: 11966: 11967: 11968: 11970: 11975: 21977: 21978: 11982: 11986: 11995: 12014: 12024: 119652026peak 1975 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Gray v. Grunnagle223 A.2d 663 (Pa. 1966)
  2. Scott v. Wilson396 S.W.2d 532 (Tex. App. 1965)
  3. Brown v. Wood202 So. 2d 125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)
  4. O'GRADY v. Wickman213 So. 2d 321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)
  5. Murray v. City of New York372 N.E.2d 560 (N.Y. 1977)
  6. Kimso Apartments, LLC v. Mahesh Gandhi23 N.E.3d 1008 (N.Y. 2014)

Most recent

  1. Voss v. Mandak Veterinary Servs.2024 NY Slip Op 33398(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Saratoga Cty. 2024)
  2. Kimso Apartments, LLC v. Mahesh Gandhi23 N.E.3d 1008 (N.Y. 2014)
  3. Laskowitz v. CIBA Vision Corp.215 A.D.2d 25 (1995)
  4. Sangiuolo v. Leventhal132 Misc. 2d 680 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1986)
  5. Burton v. Brooklyn Doctors Hospital88 A.D.2d 217 (1982)
  6. Bevilacqua v. City of Niagara Falls66 A.D.2d 988 (1978)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 7

DepthCaseCited by
Natanson v. Kline, 350 P.2d 1093 (Kan. 1960) 138
Natanson v. Kline, 354 P.2d 670 (Kan. 1960) 88
Mitchell v. Robinson, 334 S.W.2d 11 (Mo. 1960) 33
Thorne Neale & Co. v. N.Y. Southern Coal Terminal Corp., 270 A.D. 816 (1946) 13
Thorne Neale & Co. v. N.Y. Southern Coal Terminal Corp., 68 N.E.2d 56 (N.Y. 1946) 12
Charlton v. Rose, 24 A.D. 485 (1897) 7
Spinelli v. Arthur Tickle Eng'g Works, Sound Welding, 78 N.E.2d 612 (N.Y. 1948) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list