TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Rorris

The People of the State of New York v. Panayotis Rorris

People v. Rorris, 52 A.D.3d 869 (2008)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 5, 2008
Judges
Carpinello
Citations
52 A.D.3d 869859 N.Y.S.2d 272

Opinion of the Court — Carpinello

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Carpinello, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Bruhn, J.), rendered September 26, 2007, upon a verdict convicting defendant of two counts of the crime of driving while intoxicated.

Defendant was indicted on two counts of felony driving while intoxicated. Following an unsuccessful motion to suppress certain evidence, including evidence that his blood alcohol content was .15% a jury found him guilty as charged. Sentenced to five years of probation with various conditions and with the first 10 days to be served in jail, defendant now appeals. We affirm.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court properly *870 determined that a State Trooper was justified in stopping the vehicle that defendant was driving in the early morning hours of February 25, 2006, and thus properly denied his suppression motion. It is well settled that the police may lawfully stop a vehicle based on a reasonable suspicion that there has been a Vehicle and Traffic Law violation (see e.g. People v Tittensor, 244 AD2d 784 [1997]; People v Noonan, 220 AD2d 811, 812 [1995]; People v Lamanda, 205 AD2d 934 [1994], lv denied 84 NY2d 828 [1994]; People v Hines, 155 AD2d 722, 724 [1989], lv denied 76 NY2d 736 [1990]; People v Hoffman, 135 AD2d 299, 301 [1988]; see also People v Ingle, 36 NY2d 413, 414-415 [1975]). Here, a State Trooper testified at the suppression hearing that on the morning in question, he was on routine patrol heading east on a particular road. As a westbound vehicle came within 200 to 300 feet of his marked vehicle, it appeared that it was operating with its headlights on high beam. The glare was so strong that the Trooper had to squint his eyes, hold up his hand to block the glare and pull to the side of the road. The Trooper immediately turned around and initiated a traffic stop.

According to the Trooper, defendant denied that he had just been driving with the high beams on, thus prompting the Trooper to inquire if it were possible that the headlights were out of alignment. Defendant responded that he was not sure since it was not his vehicle. In the meantime, the Trooper detected an odor of alcohol emanating from the vehicle and further observed that defendant’s eyes were bloodshot and that he had an impaired physical ability to retrieve requested documents. Defendant also acknowledged that he had been drinking alcohol. Following various field sobriety tests, defendant was arrested for driving while intoxicated. A subsequent breathalyzer test revealed a blood alcohol content of .15%.

Under these circumstances, we reject defendant’s contention that he was unlawfully stopped. The Trooper’s testimony reveals that the stop was motivated by his observation that the vehicle was being operated with its high beams on, thus causing a “dangerous glare.” Since this constituted a Vehicle and Traffic Law violation (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 375 [2] [b]), the stop was authorized (see People v Hines, supra). The testimony of an auto body technician, who inspected the vehicle four months after the stop, that its headlights were in proper working order on the morning in question did not vitiate the Trooper’s testimony that he observed the vehicle being operated with its headlights on high beam.

Finally, upon our review of the record, we are unpersuaded that defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel (see *871 People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146 [1981]) or that 10 days in jail is harsh and excessive for this repeat offender (see People v Benedict, 274 AD2d 750 [2000]). Moreover, defendant’s claim that County Court sentenced him to 10 days in jail to punish him for making the suppression motion is unpreserved for our review (see People v Hurley, 75 NY2d 887, 888 [1990]) and, in any event, is unsupported by the, record (see People v Ward, 10 AD3d 805, 808 [2004], lv denied 4 NY3d 768 [2005]).

Mercure, J.E, Peters, Rose and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and matter remitted to the County Court of Ulster County for further proceedings pursuant to CEL 460.50 (5).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2009: 12011: 12012: 22014: 22017: 12020: 120092026peak 2012 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Barr v. New York State Dept. of Motor Vehicles2017 NY Slip Op 7664
  2. People v. Davis58 A.D.3d 896 (2009)
  3. People v. Cavallaro123 A.D.3d 1221 (2014)
  4. People v. Shaffer95 A.D.3d 1365 (2012)
  5. People v. Allen90 A.D.3d 1082 (2011)
  6. People v. Kindred100 A.D.3d 1038 (2012)

Most recent

  1. The People v. Robert HinshawNo. 46 (N.Y. Sept. 1, 2020)
  2. Barr v. New York State Dept. of Motor Vehicles2017 NY Slip Op 7664
  3. People v. Cavallaro123 A.D.3d 1221 (2014)
  4. People v. Frederick46 Misc. 3d 33 (2014)
  5. People v. Kindred100 A.D.3d 1038 (2012)
  6. People v. Shaffer95 A.D.3d 1365 (2012)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 10

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Hines, 155 A.D.2d 722 (1989) 12
People v. Baldi, 429 N.E.2d 400 (N.Y. 1981) 5,129
People v. Ingle, 330 N.E.2d 39 (N.Y. 1975) 490
People v. Hurley, 553 N.E.2d 1017 (N.Y. 1990) 146
People v. Noonan, 220 A.D.2d 811 (1995) 20
People v. Ward, 10 A.D.3d 805 (2004) 18
People v. Hoffman, 135 A.D.2d 299 (1988) 15
People v. Lamanda, 205 A.D.2d 934 (1994) 11
People v. Tittensor, 244 A.D.2d 784 (1997) 7
People v. Benedict, 274 A.D.2d 750 (2000) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list