TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Turner v. Steve Brody, Inc.

Jeri Turner v. Steve Brody, Inc., and Rosenthal & Curry

Turner v. Steve Brody, Inc., 24 A.D.2d 904 (1965)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 29, 1965
Citations
24 A.D.2d 904264 N.Y.S.2d 8671965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2933

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

In a proceeding for substitution of attorneys and the fixation of attorneys’ liens, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 7, 1965 as: (1) fixed the lien of the outgoing attorneys at 10% of the recovery plus any out-of-pocket disbursements; and (2) provided .that said disbursements shall be itemized by said attorneys and were to be paid before any papers in their possession were turned over to the' substituted attorneys. Order modified on the law and the facts by striking out so much thereof as fixed the lien at 10% of the recovery plus any out-of-pocket disbursements and by substituting therefor provisions: (1) fixing a retaining lien in the sum of $500 on a quantum meruit basis, plus any out-of-pocket disbursements; (2) directing that the outgoing attorneys shall itemize said disbursements; and (3) directing that upon payment of said $500 and said disbursements to the outgoing attorneys, they shall turn over to the incoming attorneys all papers and documents in their possession relating to this case. As so modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. Although the outgoing attorneys were notified that they were discharged before they instituted any legal action, they had a retaining lien, as security for their fee, on papers and documents in their possession and, immediately upon their discharge, they were entitled to compensation on a quantum meruit basis plus reimbursement for their disbursements before they released this security (Lebovic v. Ballantine & Sons, 12 A D 2d 494; Matter of Lerner v. Seigel, 22 A D 2d 816). In our opinion, the sum of $500 is fair and reasonable compensation on a quantum meruit basis. On this record, we see no need for a plenary hearing. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1988: 11989: 12001: 12003: 12004: 12026: 119882026peak 1988 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list