TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cooper v. Emmanuele

In the Matter of Margaret Cooper v. Samuel J. Emmanuele

Cooper v. Emmanuele, 25 A.D.2d 809 (1966)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 7, 1966
Judges
Bastow, Goldman, Henry, Veechio, Williams
Citations
25 A.D.2d 809270 N.Y.S.2d 991966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4531

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Order unanimously reversed, with costs and motion granted. Memorandum: The order appealed from which denied the application to vacate a former order of the court dated November 17, 1964, which directed payment to Emmanuele, the lienor, of the funds deposited to discharge the mechanic’s lien should be reversed, and such former order should be vacated. Apparently the former order was granted under the mistaken impression that payment into court to discharge a mechanic’s lien constituted payment to the lienor. This impression was erroneous. The payment merely substituted the funds for the real property, as security for the payment of the lien if, and only if, the lien should be judicially established. (Matter of Dean, 83 Hun 413 ; see, also, Matter of Standard Tile Co., 256 App. Div. 1096 , mod. 257 App. Div. 834 .) Notice of the application for payment was required under section 20 of the Lien Law. Although the affidavits in opposition to the motion to vacate state that notice of the application for the November 17, 1964 order was given to Aero Drive-In, Inc., there is no affidavit of service in the record, nor is one recited in the order. It appears to be a typical ex parte order. Furthermore, the records of the 'County Clerk contain no such notice or affidavit of service thereof. (Appeal from order of Erie 'Special Term denying petitioners’ motion to vacate the ex parte order of Justice Harold P. Kelly, entered November 17, 1964.)

Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Veechio, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1976: 21982: 11983: 11990: 119762026peak 1976 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Stanndco Developers, Inc. v. Hoffenberg534 F.2d 1050 (2d Cir. 1976)
  2. Tri-City Electric Co. v. People96 A.D.2d 146 (1983)
  3. J. Castronovo, Inc. v. Hillside Development Corp.160 A.D.2d 763 (1990)
  4. Bernardo v. Steelco, Division of Metropolitan Steel Industries, Inc.115 Misc. 2d 1020 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1982)
  5. Amadori Construction Co. v. Hoffenberg534 F.2d 1050 (2d Cir. 1976)

Most recent

  1. J. Castronovo, Inc. v. Hillside Development Corp.160 A.D.2d 763 (1990)
  2. Tri-City Electric Co. v. People96 A.D.2d 146 (1983)
  3. Bernardo v. Steelco, Division of Metropolitan Steel Industries, Inc.115 Misc. 2d 1020 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1982)
  4. Stanndco Developers, Inc. v. Hoffenberg534 F.2d 1050 (2d Cir. 1976)
  5. Amadori Construction Co. v. Hoffenberg534 F.2d 1050 (2d Cir. 1976)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Standard Tile Co. v. O'Mara, 256 A.D. 1096 (1939) 5
In re Dean, 31 N.Y.S. 959 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1894) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list