TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Morrissey v. Sheedy

John Morrissey v. Thomas D. Sheedy, Doing Business as Sheedy's Tavern

Morrissey v. Sheedy, 26 A.D.2d 683 (1966)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
July 6, 1966
Citations
26 A.D.2d 683272 N.Y.S.2d 4301966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3641

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 20, 1963 in favor of defendant Sheedy upon a jury verdict. The other defendants were not served. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The complaint, in the cause of action pleaded against defendant Sheedy, alleged in effect that plaintiff, a patron in said defendant’s tavern, was assaulted and injured by the other defendants, after they were served alcoholic beverages while in an intoxicated condition, and that defendant Sheedy was negligent in so doing and in failing to provide a safe place for plaintiff. In our opinion, the complaint sufficiently pleaded a cause of action under former section 16 of the Civil Rights Law (now General Obligations Law, § 11-101) as well as a common-law cause of action in negligence (cf. Van Tuyl v. New York Real Estate Security Co., 153 App. Div. 409, 410-411 , affd. sub nom. Carnegie *684 Trust Co. v. New York Real Estate Security Co., 207 N. Y. 691 ; Tyrrell v. Quigley, 186 Misc. 972 ). We are also of the opinion that plaintiff’s proof established a prima facie ease under both theories. It was error, therefore, to refuse plaintiff’s request to charge section 16 of the Civil Rights Law on the ground, in substance, that the complaint was based only upon common-law liability. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1971: 11981: 11995: 11996: 11997: 12011: 119712026peak 1971 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Conrad v. Beck-Turek, Ltd., Inc.891 F. Supp. 962 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)
  2. McCarthy v. Olin Corp.119 F.3d 148 (2d Cir. 1997)
  3. Manuel v. Weitzman191 N.W.2d 474 (Mich. 1971)
  4. Cole v. O'Tooles of Utica, Inc.222 A.D.2d 88 (1996)
  5. Ross v. Roberta Bar & Grill, Inc.83 A.D.2d 550 (1981)
  6. Coffey v. Esparra88 A.D.3d 621 (2011)

Most recent

  1. Coffey v. Esparra88 A.D.3d 621 (2011)
  2. McCarthy v. Olin Corp.119 F.3d 148 (2d Cir. 1997)
  3. Cole v. O'Tooles of Utica, Inc.222 A.D.2d 88 (1996)
  4. Conrad v. Beck-Turek, Ltd., Inc.891 F. Supp. 962 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)
  5. Ross v. Roberta Bar & Grill, Inc.83 A.D.2d 550 (1981)
  6. Manuel v. Weitzman191 N.W.2d 474 (Mich. 1971)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Tyrrell v. Quigley, 186 Misc. 972 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1946) 15
Van Tuyl v. N.Y. Real Estate Sec. Co., 153 A.D. 409 (1912) 13
Carnegie Trust Co. v. N.Y. Real Estate SEC. Co., 101 N.E. 1117 (N.Y. 1913) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list