TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Billy T. Robinette v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services

Robinette v. Sullivan, 974 F.2d 1331 (4th Cir. 1992)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
September 15, 1992
Docket
No. 91-2693
Citations
974 F.2d 13311992 WL 2253021992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29671
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

974 F.2d 1331

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Billy T. ROBINETTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-2693.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 31, 1992 Decided: Sept. 15, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-88-84-B)

Terry Gene Kilgore, Gate City, Virginia, for Appellant.

Richard Albert Lloret, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia; Charlotte Jefferson Hardnett, Victor Jerry Pane, Jr., Eileen Bradley, United States Department of Health & Human Services, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION 1

Billy Robinette appeals from the district court's order affirming the Secretary's decision to deny his request for Social Security benefits. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Robinette v. HHS, No. CA-88-84-B (W.D. Va. Aug. 29, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list