TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Doyle v. Killeen

Carole A. Doyle v. Henry W. Killeen

Doyle v. Killeen, 28 A.D.2d 969 (1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
September 21, 1967
Citations
28 A.D.2d 969283 N.Y.S.2d 2721967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3402

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Memorandum: This action was commenced in April, 1964. After having been removed from the Trial Calendar of Erie County Supreme Court it was restored thereto in February, 1966 upon the filing by plaintiff’s attorney of a new note of issue and statement certifying the case ready for trial. It reached the Day Calendar in February, 1967 and in the course of a pretrial conference plaintiff’s counsel for the first time announced that he intended to seek an order (1) increasing the ad damnum clause in the complaint from $50,000 to $200,000 and (2) permitting the service of a supplemental bill of particulars. The subsequent grant of such relief by Special Term was an improvident exercise of discretion. The vast majority of the increased monetary damage claimed to have been sustained by plaintiff accumulated many months before relief was sought. We find here *970 no “ extraordinary and special circumstances ” (cf. Hernandez v. Ezrow, 24 A D 2d 730; Miller v. Davis, 24 A D 2d 730) that justify the delay of plaintiff until the eve of trial. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term amending complaint in automobile negligence action.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Henry, Del Veeehio and Marsh, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1976: 219762026peak 1976 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Gardner v. Fyr-Fyter Co.55 A.D.2d 816 (1976)
  2. McLeod v. Duffy53 A.D.2d 1011 (1976)

Most recent

  1. Gardner v. Fyr-Fyter Co.55 A.D.2d 816 (1976)
  2. McLeod v. Duffy53 A.D.2d 1011 (1976)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list