Carlo v. Carlo
Audrey K. Carlo v. Louis G. Carlo
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
In an action for separation, in which the defendant-husband counterclaimed for annulment, he appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated July 18, 1967, as allowed plaintiff $420 for counsel fees and for obtaining a transcript of the stenographic minutes of the trial, in the prosecution of her appeal from the judgment rendered after trial. Order affirmed, with $25 costs and dsibursements. The allowance granted rested within the discretionary power of the Special Term (Math v. Math, 28 A D 2d 723; Martin v. Martin, 28 A D 2d 897). Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.