TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Wolfson

The People of the State of New York v. Barney Wolfson

People v. Wolfson, 32 A.D.2d 813 (1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 16, 1969
Citations
32 A.D.2d 813302 N.Y.S.2d 2171969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3740

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 14, 1967, affirmed. Defendant was indicted on October 15, 1931 for murder in the first degree. During the trial he entered a plea of guilty to murder in the second degree and was sentenced on March 21, 1932, to a term of 25 years to life. About 30 years later he obtained a vacatur of the judgment -on the ground that the guilty plea had been induced by a promise of a sentence of 20 years to life. He was rearraigned under the charge of murder in the first degree and a plea of guilty to murder in the second degree was again accepted. On May 9, 1961 he was resentenced to a term of 20 years to life; and in the present coram nobis proceeding he sought to vacate the judgment of May 9, 1961 on the ground that his rearraignment under the charge of murder in the first degree constituted double jeopardy. In our opinion, the application was properly denied. Under the circumstances herein defendant was not subjected to double jeopardy (United States v. Tateo, 377 U. S. 463 ). The holdings in United States ex rel. Hetenyi v. Wilkins ( 348 F. 2d 844 , cert. den. sub nom. Mancusi v. Hetenyi, 383 U. S. 913 ) and People v. Ressler (17 N Y 2d 174), both of which involved convictions after trial of a lesser degree of the crime charged, are not in point. In those eases a jury had been given the opportunity to find the defendant guilty of the higher degree of crime and the defendant had thereby been placed in jeopardy (see People v. Jackson, 20 N Y 2d 440, 448). Defendant’s other contentions have been considered and rejected. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1970: 11974: 11979: 11980: 12024: 119702026peak 1970 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Sweetwine v. State421 A.2d 60 (Md. 1980)
  2. People v. Burt185 N.W.2d 207 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)
  3. State v. Russo299 So. 2d 40 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)
  4. People of Michigan v. Janelle VanessNo. 369132 (Mich. Ct. App. Oct. 17, 2024)
  5. Sweetwine v. State398 A.2d 1262 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1979)

Most recent

  1. People of Michigan v. Janelle VanessNo. 369132 (Mich. Ct. App. Oct. 17, 2024)
  2. Sweetwine v. State421 A.2d 60 (Md. 1980)
  3. Sweetwine v. State398 A.2d 1262 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1979)
  4. State v. Russo299 So. 2d 40 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)
  5. People v. Burt185 N.W.2d 207 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Tateo, 377 U.S. 463 (1964) 673
United States ex rel. Hetenyi v. Wilkins, 348 F.2d 844 (2d Cir. 1965) 84
Mancusi v. Hetenyi, 383 U.S. 913 (1966) 38

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list