Cox v. Rogers
Earnest Cox v. Clifford Rogers
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Order insofar as appealed from unanimously modified in accordance with the memorandum herein, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Issues are presented in the moving papers not only as to whether the defendants landlords are responsible for code violations on the premises and for a failure to correct them but also as to plaintiffs’ own direct responsibility as tenants for their creation and maintenance. As stated in Town of Southeast v. Gonnella (26 A D 2d 550) “ In the absence of a clear right to the relief demanded, injunctive relief should not be granted until the issues have been fully explored and the entire matter resolved after plenary trial.” In the circumstances presented by the moving papers injunctive relief should not be granted without a resolution of the factual issues on the trial. (Appeal from certain parts of order of Onondaga Special Term granting preliminary injunction and denying motion to dismiss complaint.) Present— Del Vecehio, J. P., Marsh, Gabrielli, Bastow and Henry, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.