TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Claim of Famulare

In the Matter of the Claim of Ethel Famulare, Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner

In re the Claim of Famulare, 34 A.D.2d 705 (1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 23, 1970
Judges
Cooke
Citations
34 A.D.2d 705309 N.Y.S.2d 7861970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5032

Opinion of the Court — Cooke

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Cooke, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 9, 1967, which disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that she left her employment voluntarily without good cause. The board was justified in concluding, in the case of this claimant secretary living at Huntington and working in New York City, that she was aware of the relevant conditions of her employment, prior to its commencement, and that no circumstances developed in the course of it which would have justified her refusing it in the first instance (Matter of Hcmsen [Catherwood], 31 A D 2d 680). The issue of what constitutes good cause under section 593 (subd. 1) of the Labor Law is factual and the board’s determination, supported as it is by substantial evidence, should not be disturbed (Matter of Palmieri [Catherwood], 33 A D 2d 588). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Cooke, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 16 cases

View all citing references →
1975: 61976: 81992: 219752026peak 1976 · 8

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re the Claim of Grossman51 A.D.2d 853 (1976)
  2. In re the Claim of David55 A.D.2d 770 (1976)
  3. In re the Claim of Artz50 A.D.2d 958 (1975)
  4. In re the Claim of Kormendi51 A.D.2d 826 (1976)
  5. In re the Claim of Maira182 A.D.2d 962 (1992)
  6. In re the Claim of Biear49 A.D.2d 980 (1975)

Most recent

  1. In re the Claim of Goldstein183 A.D.2d 1088 (1992)
  2. In re the Claim of Maira182 A.D.2d 962 (1992)
  3. In re the Claim of David55 A.D.2d 770 (1976)
  4. In re the Claim of Dalland53 A.D.2d 933 (1976)
  5. In re the Claim of Johnson52 A.D.2d 1022 (1976)
  6. In re the Claim of Settle52 A.D.2d 674 (1976)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list